永久免费在线播放-永久免费在线-永久免费影院-永久免费视频网站-久久久久国产成人精品亚洲午夜-久久久久国产成人精品

leantp.com

Automotive engineering


Robo-Cars Need Relationship Map 2017-03-29


Even if it doesn’t quite rival the messy relationships in a daytime soap opera, autonomous vehicle partnerships are definitely part of a tangled web.

The Daimler – Bosch deal announced earlier this week, however, has brought some clarity. Daimler and Bosch said Tuesday ([**]pril 4) that they’re partnering to accelerate the production of "robo-taxis.”

The real significance of the news, however, is that all three -- Daimler, Mercedes Benz (owned by Daimler) and Tier One Robert Bosch -- have chosen Nvidia as their autonomous driving platform partner.

Mobileye vs. Nvidia
In fact, when it comes to the platform battle over Level 4 and Level 5 cars, the automotive industry today is split in two: you are either with Mobileye (soon to be part of Intel), or with Nvidia.

[**]nd Nvidia has clearly shown it is gaining momentum.

[**]sked about the Damiler-Bosch announcement, Phil Magney, founder & principal advisor at Vision Systems Intelligence, told us that Daimler must be “encouraged with Nvidia’s roadmap for both [**]I and solutions for highly automated driving.” Notably, Mercedes announced a plan to develop [**]I-based self-driving capabilities with Nvidia even before the Daimler-Bosch partnerhips happened, he explained.

?

Relationship Map among chip vendors, tech companies, Tier > <div style=Relationship Map among chip vendors, tech companies, Tier Ones and car OEMs (Source: EE Times)

?

On the other hand, an opposing camp built around the BMW/Intel/Mobileye alliance was announced last summer. Last month Intel announced the acquisition of Mobileye. Separately, Intel and Mobileye last year picked up Tier One Delphi as their partner.

Especially in recent months, among high-profile autonomous car development announcements with prestigious German car manufacturers, Nvidia is stealing Mobileye’s thunder.

But look closely, said Egil Juliussen, director research, infotainment & [**]D[**]S at?IHS?[**]utomotive. Mobileye might be “way ahead of Nvidia,” when considering the number of OEMs and Tier Ones already deeply aligned with Mobileye.


What Mobileye's annual report tells us


?Juliussen is referring to Mobileye’s unprecedented dominance in the [**]D[**]S market. The company has an almost unfair advantage when it comes to the installed base of the company’s computer vision modules. [**]ccording to Mobileye’s Form 20-F SEC filing, Mobileye's modules are “installed in approximately 15.7 million vehicles worldwide through December 31, 2016.”

Mobileye said, “Our technology is available with 21 OEMs. Furthermore, our products have been selected for implementation with more than 25 OEMs.”

But of course, this is all [**]D[**]S. [**] big question, said Juliussen, is “whether Mobileye can transfer their relationships to the autonomous vehicle platform.”

Mobileye’s SEC filing, however, indicates that they are not doing badly in coming design wins. The company has design-wins from five OEMs for Level 3 autonomous driving in the pipeline. It also has wins from five OEMs for Level 4 autonomous driving.

Many auto industry observers believe Mobileye can effectively convert from [**]D[**]S to autonomous vehicle design.

Part of the reason is that the Israeli team hasn’t stopped innovating. The Mobileye team, now a division of Intel, led by [**]mnon Shashua, a computer science professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, co-founder and CTO at Mobileye, has been already put lots of resources into developing substantive technology components that go way beyond [**]D[**]S.

?

[**]mnon Shashua, co-founder and CTO of Mobileye
[**]mnon Shashua, co-founder and CTO of Mobileye

When Intel announced the acquisition of Mobileye, Magney observed, “I think Intel believes Mobileye’s team is further along in the development, not only vision but other technologies like behavior (Driving Policy) and localization (REM).”

[**]ccording to Mobileye, REM is “is an end-to-end mapping and localization engine for full autonomy.”

The solution consists of three layers: harvesting agents (any camera-equipped vehicle), map aggregating server (cloud), and map-consuming agents (autonomous vehicle).??

Considering the plethora of camera modules already installed in the “harvesting agents,” Mobileye has a lot to gain by promoting REM. [**]nd the company is making sure that those OEMs who are already hooked on Mobileye’s computer vision modules feel the same way. Data collected by these “harvesting agents” is paving the way for the eventual BMW/Intel/Mobileye autonomous vehicle platform to succeed on the road.

Multiple development programs


?It’s hard to predict, however, whether these publicly announced partnerships will stay intact in the long run. Some car OEMs might simply want something quick so they can show a cool autonomous car demo on the road by 2020 — as promised —??with little intention to make money from it.

While others might be gunning for autonomous vehicles, they feel pressed to explore a new “robo-taxi” business model.

Magney explained, “Urban mobility platforms probably represent the best ROI in the near term because the business models for shared mobility are so well established.” He said, “Furthermore, these vehicles allow their makers to deploy within a ‘somewhat’ constrained environment compared to full L5 automation anywhere.”

It’s also important to note that vehicles deployed for these applications will have “a heavy [**]V ([**]utomated Vehicle) Stack. Very costly, multiple redundancies, fail safe, lots of data collection and OT[**] (Over the [**]ir) capabilities,” as Magney noted.

This is good for gaining experience but the danger is an autonomous vehicle that ends up as a science project with little practical value.

Meanwhile, car OEMs are known to run multiple development programs in parallel. Consider Mercedes.? Before its parent Daimler decided to partner with Bosch, Mercedes-Benz reportedly had two engineering teams working on autonomous vehicles. Reuters reported, “One took an evolutionary approach, upgrading the capabilities of conventional vehicles, while the other team took a more radical approach to the car's design.”

Magney believes it likely, given especially at this stage, “they have to examine different approaches.”


Who’s in bed with whom


?[**]s Juliussen said, there’s the BMW/Intel/Mobileye group. [**]s Mobileye’s SEC filing indicates, this group has signed up at least five OEMs for Level 4 cars, he explained.

Then, there’s the Nvidia’s platform. Besides [**]udi and Daimler, Nvidia has partnered with both Bosch and ZF – two Tier Ones. “They are significant,” said Juliussen, because they can get more automotive OEMs.

?

?

In contrast, both GM and Ford, the two large car OEMs in the United States, are pursuing a similar strategy by acquiring automotive software companies. GM acquired Cruise [**]utomation a year ago, while Ford bought [**]rgo [**]I two months ago, each OEM shelling out $1 billion for the acquisition. Neither has announced its hardware choices.

Waymo announced deals with Honda and Fiat Chrysler, under which each OEM?supplies vehicles to Waymo. It is not known if the Honda-Waymo partnership will evolve any further.?
Toyota launched the Toyota Research Institute (TRI), which is investing over a billion dollars in robotics and artificial intelligence over the next five years, but has not announced either a hardware or software platform.

Gil Pratt, a former MIT professor who heads the year-old TRI, most famously said during the CES 2017, even with huge recent advances in artificial intelligence ([**]I), "We are not even close" to Level 5 autonomous cars. While some people felt his view was extremely conservative, others found Pratt brutally honest and realistic.

Magney said, "The Toyota approach is very pragmatic and probably aligns with the realities of an automaker that plans to sell millions of cars to consumers before we have mass shifts in ownership."

While details of their own highly automated driving platforms remain unknown, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia are all using Mobileye for their [**]D[**]S cars, according to Juilussen.

It should be also noted that Uber and Daimler earlier this year struck partnership for self-driving vehicles. Magney said, "You have to acknowledge the potential of Uber -- if they get the technology right they can roll out through their existing mobility platform where they have huge advantage."

Last but least, there is Tesla. [**]fter its fallout with Mobileye, Tesla is currently working with Nvidia. Magney said, "Tesla deserves a lot of credit for what they have accomplished -- they developed the right architecture from the beginning and started to enable automation features with software." ?


Options for startups and OEMs


?IHS [**]utomotive’s Juliussen explained several different ways those interested in autonomous cars can enter the market.

If you are a startup, said Juliussen, “you source EV batteries, focus on luxury vehicle models and buy an autonomous software platform from someone else or design your own. Then, get a contract manufacturer and have them build a car for you.” This is a model followed by companies like Zoox, Waymo, or potentially even [**]pple, he noted.

If you are an OEM, there are three options, Juliussen said. “First, you develop your own software platform -- either through the acquisition of an automotive software company or via your internal team.” This is the approach taken by GM and Ford.

Second, “you could follow a more normal strategy by hiring a Tier One” to design an autonomous car, he said. You can, for example, hire Delphi to help you build a Mobileye-based autonomous vehicle platform, he noted.

For many OEMs, this is a tried and tested model. [**]sked what Daimler was seeing in Bosch that Daimler couldn’t do it alone, Magney said, first and foremost, “Integration.” He explained that Bosch brings deep integration skills and know-how to make a system truly production-ready. Magney added, “Bosch has lots of ECU experience as well as supporting domains with the [**]V Stack such as sensing.” But in the particular case of Daimler’s partnership with Bosch, Magney suspects the decision was driven by “Daimler’s desire to go with Nvidia’s architecture and supporting frameworks.”

[**]s for smaller car OEMs with not enough resources, Juliussen suggested a third option. “They can get a software platform from the third party and get a contract manufacturer to build it.”

Or, they can forget about autonomous cars altogether and focus on the development of [**]D[**]S vehicles.

Regarding the brain chip for autonomous cars, competition is currently shaping up as a two-way battle. But this is a market in its infancy. Just this week a new player, Mentor, revealed a centralized autonomous vehicle platform with architecture squarely focused on raw-data sensor fusion, opening up another option Tier Ones and car OEMs can consider.

Magney summed up: "The building blocks for automation are out there as the push from the tech community has shown. The real challenge is the integration into a total automotive ready platform. There are so many domains within the [**]V Stack (perception, behavior, control and safety) and nobody owns all those pieces. This is why we see a flurry of activities related to centralized domain control for highly automated driving."





主站蜘蛛池模板: xxx日本hd | 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品26u | 精品国产乱码久久久久久夜深人妻 | 女人一级毛片免费观看 | 无码人妻精品国产婷婷 | 亚洲国产精麻豆 | 超大BBWWW| 加勒比一本之道高清视频在线观看 | 国产成人亚洲精品午夜国产馆 | 国产亚洲AV无码成人网站 | 乱h好大噗嗤噗嗤烂了 | 一个人在线观看免费高清视频 | 牛和人交videos欧美 | 国产精品第3页 | 精品日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 牛牛在线视频 | 伊人久久大香线蕉综合bd高清 | 国产精品无码人妻在线 | 亚洲高清视频在线 | 免费乱理伦片在线观看夜 | 果冻传媒色AV国产播放 | 久久国产精品萌白酱免费 | 欧美日韩中文国产一区 | 欧美videqsdesex0 | 99re 这里只有精品 | 国产精品一区第二页 | 亚洲精品久久久久久久蜜臀老牛 | 久久这里只有精品2 | 免费精品国产日韩热久久 | 国产在线公开视频 | 俄罗斯videosbest8 | 小夫妻天天恶战 | 国产原创中文视频 | 欧美亚洲色帝国 | 强上轮流内射高NP男男 | 乌克兰18性hd | 日韩欧美一区二区中文字幕 | 91国偷自产一区二区三区 | 手机在线观看毛片 | 国产日韩高清一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品久久精品6 |